2009 TDM Technology & Innovation Symposium | Evaluation

Evaluation

Please help us improve future TDM/TI Symposiums by taking a few minutes to complete this evaluation.

1. What type of organization did you represent at the symposium ? (optional)






2. The TDM/TI Symposium took place at a time that was convenient for you to attend.






3. Which duration of time would you most prefer for future forums/symposiums?




4. The information presented at the TDM/TI Symposium was useful to you for addressing transportation related issues in your jurisdiction.







5. The symposium helped to better define Transportation Demand Management effectively.







6. How likely are you to apply the policies and strategies discussed at the Symposium in your jurisdiction?







7. Arlie Adkins, the presenter of Trip Generation, Parking Generation and Transit-Oriented Development, was interesting and informative.






8. Anne E. Mudge. the presenter of SB 375 provided a greater understanding of the Bill.






9. Which topics would you like to see discussed at future forums/symposiums?






10. Did you attend the Overview of the 2009 Call for Projection application/TDM modal workshop (after lunch)?



If so, will the information presented encourage you to apply to the under the TDM modal category ?



11. I found the TDM/TI Symposium speakers to be interesting and informative.
  5=strongly agree 4=Agree 3=Neutral 2=Disagree 1=strongly disagree
Glenn Hiemstra Futurist
Todd Litman (Victoria Transport Institute)
Arlie Adkins (UC Berkeley, Researcher)
Naresh Amatya, (SCAG)
Anne E. Mudge (Attorney, SB 375)
Dan Sturges (New-Mobility)

12. Did you find the networking time during the Continental Breakfast of value?



Please rank 5=strongly agree 1=strongly disagree

13. Did you find the exhibitor presentation rotations during the lunch hour beneficial?



14. What types of vendors/exhibitors would you like to see in the future?

How can the TDM/TI Symposium be improved?